user_guide:tutorials:lattice_polytopes_tutorial

This tutorial is probably also available as a Jupyter notebook in the demo folder in the polymake source and on github.

Different versions of this tutorial: latest release, release 3.6, release 3.5, release 3.4, nightly master

# Tutorial for Lattice Polytopes

This page gives a small introduction to lattice polytopes in polymake, some useful external software, and usage hints for it. For a list of methods and properties applicable to lattice polytopes see here. For an introduction to the polymake package see here.

polymake always assumes that the lattice used to define a lattice polytope is the standard lattice Zd. Some rules also require that the polytope is full dimensional. There are user functions that transform a polytope sitting in some affine subspace of Rd into a full dimensional polytope, either in the induced lattice or the lattice spanned by the vertices, see below.

For some computations polymake has no built-in commands and passes the computation to external software. Currently, polymake has an interface to the following packages that compute various properties of lattice polytopes.

• libnormaliz by Winfried Bruns and Bogdan Ichim, bundled with polymake
• 4ti2 by the 4ti2 team
• LattE macchiato by Matthias Köppe, building on LattE by Jesus de Loera et. al.
• (barvinok by Sven Verdoolaege)

Unless you want to deal with Hilbert bases of cones you don't need them. If you do, either the bundled extension libnormaliz or the external package 4ti2 suffices to do most computations with lattice polytopes. Computation of Gröbner bases currently requires 4ti2. LattE only counts lattice points in a polytope and computes its Ehrhart polynomial, but may be faster on that than any other methods implemented. barvinok can be used to compute the number of lattice points and the h-polynomial. Access to barvinok is realized via an extension which has to be downloaded separately.

For some of the commands in this tutorial you will need at least one of bundled:libnormaliz enabled or 4ti2 installed on your machine. We'll remind you at the relevant places.

We start by creating a rational polytope using one of polymake's standard polytope constructions. We choose the 3-dimensional cube with coordinates +1 and -1. So we start polymake at the command line and assign a cube to the variable $p. >$p=cube(3);

Suppose we want to know how many lattice points this cube contains. The answer is of course already known, as the cube has one relative interior integral point per non-empty face. So we expect to get the answer 27.

> print $p->N_LATTICE_POINTS; 27 To satisfy this request, polymake computes all properties necessary to call an external program that provides the number of lattice points. In this case, polymake has passed the request to lattE, which is shown by the credit message that appears before the answer. By default, credits for external software are shown when an external package is used for the first time. You can change this behavior using the variable $Verbose::credits. If you don't have a version of LattE, or if you have set different preferences, then polymake may choose one of the other programs. So the credit statement depends on your configuration.

We can of course also ask polymake to compute the integral points for us. For our next computations we are only interested in the integral points in the interior of the cube, so we ask for

> print $p->INTERIOR_LATTICE_POINTS; 1 0 0 0 Internally, polymake computes the intersection of the polytope with the integer lattice, and then checks which of the points lies on a facet of$p. By default, polymake uses a project-and-lift algorithms to enumerate the lattice points. Note that our call to LattE above has only computed the number of integral points (which is done with an improved version of Barvinok's algorithm), so polymake really has to compute something here. If we had asked for INTERIOR_LATTICE_POINTS first, then N_LATTICE_POINTS would just have counted the rows of a matrix, which would have been much faster. So computation time can depend on the history.

You can also ask for the HILBERT_BASIS, though in the case of a cube the result is not so exciting:

> print $p->HILBERT_BASIS; 1 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 -1 0 1 -1 -1 1 1 -1 0 -1 1 -1 0 0 1 -1 0 1 1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 1 0 1 -1 1 1 1 0 -1 -1 1 0 -1 0 1 0 -1 1 1 0 0 -1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 -1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 -1 0 1 1 -1 1 1 1 0 -1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 polymake has no native method to compute a Hilbert basis, so it has passed the computation to 4ti2. The choice may vary, depending on what is installed on your computer (and configured for polymake). You can influence the choice with the appropriate prefer statement. Note that so far these commands also work for rational polytopes. Now we want to do some computations that don't make sense for polytopes that have non-integral vertex coordinates. We can let polymake check that our cube is indeed a polytope with integral vertices. > print$p->LATTICE;
true

A particularly interesting class of lattice polytopes is that of reflexive polytopes. A polytope is reflexive if its polar is agein alattice polytope. This implies in particular that the origin is the unique interior lattice point in the polytope. So, as we have seen above, our cube is a candidate. But this is not sufficient, so we have to do further checks.

Reflexivity is a property that is not defined for polytopes with non-integral vertices. So if we ask for it in polymake, then polymake checks that the entered polytope is indeed a lattice polytope (i.e. it is bounded and has integral vertices). In that case the object will automatically get the specialization Polytope::Lattice.

> print $p->REFLEXIVE; true Lattice polytopes can be used to define toric varieties with an ample line bundle, and many properties of the variety are reflected by the polytope. here is an example: The toric variety defined by our cube is smooth, i.e. it is one of the smooth toric Fano varieties. In polymake, we can just ask for this property in the following way. > print$p->SMOOTH;
true

The number of integral points in the k-th dilate of a polytope is given by a polynomial of degree d in k. This is the famous Ehrhart Theorem. In polymake you can obtain the coefficients of this polynomial (starting with the constant coefficient).

> print $p->EHRHART_POLYNOMIAL; 8*x^3 + 12*x^2 + 6*x + 1 polymake has passed this request to LattE or normaliz, but as we have used these programs already the credit message is suppressed (but if you save the cube to a file, then you will find it in there). Some coefficients of this polynomial have a geometric interpretation. E.g., the highest coefficient is the Euclidean volume of the polytope. > print$p->VOLUME;
8

By a theorem of Stanley, the generating function for the number of lattice points can be written as the quotient of a polynomial h(t) by (1-t)d+1, and this polynomial has non-negative integral coefficients.

> print $p->H_STAR_VECTOR; 1 23 23 1 > print$p->LATTICE_DEGREE;
3
> print $p->LATTICE_CODEGREE; 1 In our case the coefficient vector is symmetric, as the polytope is reflexive. The co-degree of the polytope is d+1 minus the degree of the h-polynomial. It is the smallest factor by which we have to dilate the polytope to obtain an interior integral point. In our case, this is 1, as the cube already has an integral point. We can obtain the volume of our polytope also from the H_STAR_VECTOR: Summing up the coefficients give the lattice volume of the polytope, which is d! times its Euclidean volume. > print$p->LATTICE_VOLUME;
48

Let us look at a different example:

> $q=new Polytope(INEQUALITIES=>[[5,-4,0,1],[-3,0,-4,1],[-2,1,0,0],[-4,4,4,-1],[0,0,1,0],[8,0,0,-1],[1,0,-1,0],[3,-1,0,0]]); This actually defines a lattice polytope, which we can see from the list of vertices: > print$q->VERTICES;
1 3 1 7
1 2 0 3
1 3 0 7
1 2 1 7
1 2 0 4
1 3 1 8
1 3 0 8
1 2 1 8

polymake provides basically three methods for convex hull conversion, double description, reverse search, and beneath beyond. The first two are provided by the packages cdd and lrs, the last in internal. By default, cdd is chosen, and that is what was used above (they are bundled with polymake, you don't have to install them). A polytope Q is normal if every lattice point in the k-th dilate of Q is the sum of k lattice points in Q. You can check this property via

> print $q->NORMAL; false So our polytope is not normal. We can also find a point that violates the condition. Being normal is equivalent to the fact, that the Hilbert basis of the cone C(Q) obtained from Q by embedding the polytope at height one and the coning over it has all its generators in height one. The property HILBERT_BASIS computes these generators: > print$q->HILBERT_BASIS;
1 2 0 3
1 2 0 4
1 2 1 7
1 2 1 8
1 3 0 7
1 3 0 8
1 3 1 7
1 3 1 8
2 5 1 13

The last row is the desired vector: [2,5,1,13] is a vector in 2*Q, but it is not a sum of lattice points in Q. The cone C(Q) corresponds to an affine toric variety, and the above tells us that this variety is not normal. Yet, it is very ample, as we can check with

> print $q->VERY_AMPLE; true Now assume we are particularly interested in the third facet of Q. We can pick this via >$f=facet($q,2); Recall that indexes in polymake start at 0, so the third facet has index 2. This is again a very ample polytope: > print$f->VERY_AMPLE;
true

The result is no surprise, being very ample is inherited by faces. We could also be interested in the facet width of the polytope $f. This is the minimum over the maximal distance of a facet to any other vertex. polymake knows how to compute this: > #print$f->FACET_WIDTH;

Almost. It tells you that it can only do this for a full dimensional polytope, i.e. for a polytope whose dimension coincides with the ambient dimension. This is not true for our facet: It lives in the same ambient space as $q, but has one dimension less. We can remedy this by applying the following: >$g=ambient_lattice_normalization($f); > print$g->FACET_WIDTH;
1

The function ambient_lattice_normalization returns a full dimensional version of the polytope $f in the lattice induced by the intersection of the affine space of $f with Z^n. Now $g is full dimensional, and we can compute the facet width. Note that there is also a function which normalizes in the lattice spanned by the vertices of the polytope: vertex_facet_normalization. This can also be usefull for full dimensional polytopes. E.g. consider the cube we defined above. The sum of the entries of each vertex is odd, so the lattice spannd by the vertices is a sublattice of the integer lattice: >$cr=vertex_lattice_normalization($p); > print$cr->VERTICES;
(4) (0 1)
1 1 0 0
1 0 1 0
1 1 1 0
1 0 0 1
1 1 0 1
1 0 1 1
1 1 1 1

$cr is the same cube, but we have reduced the lattice. (The first line is a sparse representation of a vector: it has length 4, and the only non-zero entry is at position 0 and is 1 (note that indexes start at 0)). polymake has only few builtin functions to compute properties of the variety associated to a fan or lattice polytope. There are two extensions available that add more properties, both currently at an early stage: Here we will do some computations that do not require one of the extensions. We start by defining a fan. We'll make our live easy and take the normal fan of our cube: > application "fan"; >$f = normal_fan($p); > print$f->SMOOTH_FAN;
true

With the last line we have verified that our fan defines a smooth toric variety. Note that switching the application is not strictly necessary, you can also prepend calls to functions and constructors with fan::. The fan object $f itself knows its type, and chooses available properties based on this. Any smooth variety is Gorenstein, so we expect the following: > print$f->GORENSTEIN;
true

Similarly, we could check for Q-Gorensteinness with Q_GORENSTEIN. It is also a complete fan:

> print $f->COMPLETE; true but currently there is little support to detect completeness in polymake. In our case it was already decided during construction, normal fans are complete. You can also check standard features of fans, like their rays. Let us do this for the normal fan of our other example: >$g=normal_fan($q); > print$g->RAYS;
-1 0 1/4
0 -1 1/4
1 0 0
1 1 -1/4
0 1 0
0 0 -1
0 -1 0
-1 0 0

This is not what we wanted. We would like to see the minimal lattice generators of the rays. We can fix this using

> print primitive($g->RAYS); -4 0 1 0 -4 1 1 0 0 4 4 -1 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1 0 0 Note that the function primitive returns a copy of the argument, the RAYS as stored in the fan are unchanged. So you have to apply this function each time you need the primitive generators, or you store them in a new variable. The fan$g$is not smooth, but still Gorenstein: > print$g->SMOOTH_FAN;
false
> print $g->GORENSTEIN; true You can also access the maximal cones of the fan via > print$g->MAXIMAL_CONES;
{0 1 6 7}
{0 1 2 4}
{0 4 7}
{1 2 6}
{2 3 4}
{5 6 7}
{3 4 5 7}
{2 3 5 6}

The indices in these list refer to the list of rays. Sometimes you might be interested in the walls, i.e. the codimension 2 faces of the fan. Here is one way to get them

> print rows_numbered($g->HASSE_DIAGRAM->FACES); 0:-1 1:0 1 6 7 2:0 1 2 4 3:0 4 7 4:1 2 6 5:2 3 4 6:5 6 7 7:3 4 5 7 8:2 3 5 6 9:0 1 10:0 7 11:1 6 12:6 7 13:0 4 14:1 2 15:2 4 16:4 7 17:2 6 18:3 4 19:2 3 20:5 7 21:5 6 22:3 5 23:0 24:1 25:7 26:6 27:4 28:2 29:3 30:5 31: > print$g->HASSE_DIAGRAM->nodes_of_dim($g->DIM-2); {23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30} where the list of numbers given by the latter are the indices of the codimension 2 faces in the list of all faces given before. There is a more concise way to list those, using some simple perl programming: > print map($g->HASSE_DIAGRAM->FACES->[$_], @{$g->HASSE_DIAGRAM->nodes_of_dim($g->DIM-2)}); {0}{1}{7}{6}{4}{2}{3}{5} If the lattice polytope lives in R^2 or R^3, then we can visualize the polytope together with its lattice points. The picture below has been made with ''javaview'', but polymake's standard visualization method is now jreality, which is bundled with polymake. >$p->VISUAL->LATTICE_COLORED;

The output may look similar to the following.

The command LATTICE_COLORED sorted the lattice points into three classes before visualization: lattice points in the interior of the polytope, lattice points on the boundary, and vertices that are not in the lattice. These classes are then visualized with different colors (where we only see two in the above picture, as all vertices of the cube are in the lattice). If you don't need this distinction, VISUAL→LATTICE avoids the additional computations.

polymake can use 4ti2 and lattE via a file based interface and libnormaliz >= 3.1.0 as library, (the file based interface to normaliz has been discontinued) for lattice computations and prints all available packages during startup. To tell polymake about a newly installed program run polymake –reconfigure or issue the command reconfigure during the interactive session. polymake may ask you to confirm the paths to the binaries.

Application polytope uses following third-party software (for details: help 'credits';)
4ti2, cddlib, latte, libnormaliz, lrslib, nauty

The output at this position depends on the software available on your computer. To see each call to an external program you can either set the variable $Verbose::external=1; on the command line or include the line $Polymake::User::Verbose::external=1 in ~/.polymake/prefer.pl. If you just want to see the credit message instead of the program call, set $Verbose::credits=2 instead. If this is 1, then a credit is shown when a package is used for the first time, if 0, then all credits are suppressed (but you can find them in the file afterwards). >$Verbose::external=1;
> print \$p->EHRHART_POLYNOMIAL;
8*x^3 + 12*x^2 + 6*x + 1

You can ask polymake to prefer one package over another by setting prefer “program”; where program is one of _4ti2, latte and normaliz2. Of course, the corresponding package needs to be installed on your computer.

To prefer one program only for some computations you may append one of .integerpoints, .hilbert, .ehrhartpoly for rules computing NLATTICEPOINTS, LATTICEPOINTS, HILBERTBASIS or EHRHARTPOLYNOMIAL. (Or prefer_now just for the next computation)

> print cube(2)->N_LATTICE_POINTS;
9
> prefer_now "libnormaliz";
> print cube(2)->N_LATTICE_POINTS;
9
> print cube(2)->EHRHART_POLYNOMIAL;
4*x^2 + 4*x + 1
• user_guide/tutorials/lattice_polytopes_tutorial.txt